A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to build their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by building a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such spots are topic to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic of the depth in the dispute. These steps weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they have explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely endeavoring to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming much more contentious.
The Irish Moments short article about René Collier mentioned the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on setting up and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other very long following the legal prices are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.